Non-Fungible Tokens and Intellectual Property: Navigating the Digital Age

One of the latest developments shaking up the Intellectual Property (IP) world is the rise of non-fungible tokens (NFTs). These unique cryptographic tokens leverage blockchain technology to securely record and transfer information, providing a digital title for assets like images, music, or text. But what does this mean for trade mark protection?

What Are Non-fungible Tokens, NFTs?

Non-fungible Tokens, NFTs serve as a bridge between a digital or physical asset and its unique blockchain token, verifying ownership through a digital wallet. Unlike cryptocurrencies, which are interchangeable, NFTs are unique and cannot be exchanged on a like-for-like basis. Initially popularised in the art world, they have since expanded into industries such as gaming, sports, and even luxury fashion.

Nike is a leading example of a major brand embracing NFTs. Through its acquisition of the digital fashion startup RTFKT , Nike has developed virtual sneakers and collectibles tied to NFTs. These digital items are available for use in virtual worlds and games, allowing users to showcase their brand loyalty in the metaverse.

One notable project is the release of CryptoKicks, a line of NFT sneakers. Each CryptoKick comes with a unique digital design, and some even allow for customisation through “skin vials,” further enhancing their appeal. Owners can display their NFT sneakers in virtual spaces or trade them on NFT marketplaces.

Nike’s adoption of NFTs demonstrates the potential for blending traditional branding with cutting-edge digital innovation. It also highlights how brands can tap into new revenue streams and foster deeper engagement with tech-savvy audiences.

By incorporating blockchain technology, Nike not only reinforces its brand’s authenticity but also positions itself as a leader in the future of virtual commerce.

These tokens provide brands with a way to combat counterfeiting, ensuring the authenticity and traceability of their products. Blockchain’s immutable ledger acts as a digital certificate of authenticity, which is particularly useful in sectors prone to counterfeit goods.

Despite their growing significance, NFTs currently lack a specific legal definition under UK law. However, they can still be understood within the existing legal framework. In the UK, NFTs are considered digital assets, and trade mark law applies to them as it would to other forms of digital content. Recent updates to the Nice Classification (the international system used to categorise goods and services for trade marks) now explicitly include virtual goods and NFTs under Class 9, which covers downloadable digital files.

This update allows businesses to register trade marks for virtual products such as digital clothing or accessories linked to NFTs. However, trade mark holders in traditional product categories (e.g., physical apparel under Class 25) may need to expand their registrations to include Class 9 if they wish to protect their brands in the digital realm.

Trade Mark Challenges in the NFT Space

NFTs pose several challenges to traditional trade mark principles, particularly around territoriality and speciality:

  1. Territoriality: Trade mark protection is typically territorial, applying only in jurisdictions where the trade mark is registered. But NFTs operate on decentralised networks, accessible worldwide. This raises questions about how a UK trade mark holder can enforce rights when an infringing NFT is accessible globally.
  2. Speciality: Trade mark rights are limited to the goods and services for which the mark is registered. If a brand’s trade mark is registered for physical goods but not virtual equivalents, they may struggle to prevent unauthorised use of their brand in NFTs representing digital goods.

Case Study: Hermès v. MetaBirkin

While this case occurred in the US, its principles are relevant globally. Hermès successfully argued that an NFT collection titled “MetaBirkin” infringed its trade mark for the iconic Birkin bag. The court recognised that NFTs could mislead consumers into believing the digital product was associated with the brand, even if the NFT had no practical use as a handbag.

This case underscores the importance of a global assessment of the likelihood of confusion, considering both the technical aspects of the NFT and its representation. The ruling highlights that trade marks must protect not only the functional attributes of goods but also their symbolic and brand value, even in digital formats.

Opportunities for Brands

Despite these challenges, NFTs offer significant opportunities for trade mark holders. They provide new avenues for brand engagement and revenue generation in virtual environments. Moreover, NFTs enhance brand protection by offering digital certificates of authenticity, helping to combat counterfeiting.

To fully capitalise on these opportunities, businesses should consider expanding their trade mark registrations to include virtual goods under Class 9. Doing so ensures comprehensive protection across both physical and digital markets.

Conclusion

The rise of NFTs is reshaping the landscape of intellectual property. While they present unique challenges, including issues of territoriality and speciality, they also offer exciting opportunities for brands to innovate and protect their assets in the digital age. At National Business Register, we’re here to guide you through this evolving landscape, helping you safeguard your brand across all platforms.

Contact us today to discuss how we can help protect your intellectual property in the NFT space. Call us on 0800 069 9090 or email Info@nbrg.co.uk.

Don’t leave your IP to chance – let’s protect your business together.